Listen with webreader

I figure it’s time to put my foot in the middle of this debate. Luckily, I believe that my opinion won’t be the death knell of this blog, nor do I believe it will engender lots of hate from either side. Balance; that’s what I like.

http://isitpossibletomakemoneyonline.blogspot.com/
Creative Commons License teadrinker via Compfight

Let’s get this out of the way. In America, the rich already pay the most taxes. It’s not like they can’t afford it but some of them are paying close to 50% of whatever they make. Of course, the smart ones aren’t anywhere close to this amount because they find ways to divest themselves of some of their wealth through investments and donations, and if they strike the right balance they might even find a way to get out of actually paying anything at all.

Still, the majority are paying more taxes by percentage. Should they be?

The main reason, actually the only reason, I’ve ever heard for why they shouldn’t pay more taxes is because they create jobs. I hate saying it this way but that’s a lie that’s been perpetuated for decades. Just last month an article in Business Insider pretty much shut down that myth.

Instead, it said that, though some rich people do create jobs, what really creates jobs is having a robust middle class with money to spend so they can buy more stuff, which in turn gets manufacturers to make more stuff, smart people to create more stuff, and companies having to hire more people to make all that stuff.

Frankly, that’s a nice symbiosis for any country to have, since it’s the middle class that supposedly most of commerce is based on and geared towards. Even though all the billionaires in the world make up more than 2 trillion dollars of wealth, they’re not buying the stuff that the middle class buys; that 1%, with all its wealth, isn’t enough to sustain an economy.

So, now that we got that one out of the way, should the rich pay more taxes? President Obama believes so, as its a cornerstone of the Affordable Care Act. There’s no secret that I like this Act, as I’m a beneficiary of it. However, I acknowledge that it’s still not all that great for much of the middle class. I also acknowledge that, for once, I don’t believe taxing the rich more to pay for this, since they’re not going to be using it, isn’t quite fair either.

HEALTH IS WEALTH
Nick Sherman via Compfight

Of course, taxes are more than just about health care. On a federal level taxes pay for our legislators (there’s a good reason not to have to pay any taxes), highways and air traffic safety (good reasons for taxes) and many other things such as disaster relief. We need the money for that and for things like grants for college students, state education and welfare plans. We also need it for Medicare and Social Security, which so many people hate until they’re of age and need it.

Still, should all of this be put on the rich? Well, not exactly. I have some thoughts that I’d like to share on how to help with some of this country’s money issues that shouldn’t overly impact the rich but still helps this country out.

One, I believe that there should be a wealth limit on who’s liable to receive Medicare and Social Security benefits. Did you know that President Reagan, a multimillionaire, collected Medicare benefits and probably collected Social Security? I don’t actually know about the second one but I know about the first.

If I had my way, anyone that had savings or investments of more than a million dollars, or was collecting more than $75,000 a year in retirement, doesn’t qualify for either of these. They don’t need it but millions of other people do. Sure, I hear the argument that they paid into it and should get it; I’m betting they paid into lots of stuff they’re not getting back and got some breaks along the way that their less heeled counterparts didn’t. That would be my first move.

The second thing I’d do is allow the rich to protect half of all their earnings up front. I don’t think it’s fair that someone earned $10 million a year and the government gets half of it.

What I’d do instead is, for anyone who makes more than $750,000 a year, tax half of their earnings at a 50% rate, which means they’d initially owe a flat tax of 25% of all they earned. Then I’d allow for discounts up to 15% based off donations, investments and the like. Almost no one would get away with not paying any taxes in any year unless they owned a small business, incorporated or not, and their business earned less than a 10% increase.

SHARE THE WEALTH!
Creative Commons License Newtown grafitti via Compfight

One more thing I’d do, and this would be very controversial and yet pro-America, is to have very strict rules for companies that aren’t non-profits that employ more than 500 people. My rule would be that any company that moves more than 5% of its workforce out of the country, or cuts more than 5% of its workforce in a year and still makes a profit, doesn’t qualify for a refund, even if they qualify for not paying any taxes. I still remember a story about General Electric a few years ago getting a refund of more than $10 million from the government, which is a pittance to them, but made a profit for the year by laying off employees and closing some of its locations; that irked me to no end.

On the flip side, any company that created at least 5% more jobs that paid an overall average of $20,000 a year would get a tax break. I’m not sure how to do the math to determine what kind of tax break would be fair but let’s face the fact that it’s corporations that create jobs, not rich people, and if they need an incentive to help get people back to work that’s it.

I’ve written other articles over the years giving ways to spur the economy, and I always offer the caveat that my ideas may not be perfect but they’re ideas, something I don’t really see anyone else attempting to come up with. My way, the federal government can make more money, we might put more people back to work which also earns the government more money, the rich aren’t really hurt as badly (at least some of them), some loopholes are closed, and we possibly keep health care funded while having time to work on more serious health issues (such as keeping costs down, reducing medical errors, etc).

At least it’s a thought. I’d like to know your thoughts on what I’ve said and, please, offer your own suggestions on how our government can help get us on the road to recovery… not that we’ll be getting the political parties talking to each other congenially anytime soon anyway…
 

Listen with webreader

Can I ask you a question? What is your mindset as it relates to money? Have you ever thought about it? I bet you haven’t, and if that’s the case, then I’m here to get you thinking about it.

moneybags
Alex Cockroach via Compfight

It’s my belief that I have better habits than you as it pertains to money. It’s also my belief that I have some of the same habits that you have as it pertains to money. Those two things might seem to contradict each other, so let me explain.

When money is tight, or I’m in “protect mode”, I’m the best budgeter you’ve ever seen. Any extra money I get goes directly into the pot to pay bills. I budget everything, from how much money I’m spending on groceries for the week to how much gas I really need to put in the car. If it’s winter and I’m working from home, I’ll drop the heat to the lowest temperature I can stand, put on extra shirts, and throw more covers on the bed.

When money isn’t tight and it’s flowing pretty well, my behavior slightly changes. I still budget for bills, sometimes paying more than what’s expected so I can get ahead. I also don’t withhold myself from buying almost anything I want, within reason. I’m not out there dropping thousands on things, but I will grab a couple hundred and head to the casino more often, or pamper myself with a massage because, hey, my work is stressful.

The main difference between myself and possibly 90% of the population is that I know exactly how much money I have coming in all the time and how much I have going to bills. Even when I’m spending more money, I’m spending money using my debit card or cash rather than piling it onto a credit card, thus my debt isn’t rising. There are expenses I put on my business American Express card that I pay off each month so I can accumulate points, but that’s it.

I tend to believe that how we think about money is how we think about ourselves. Do we live fast and free, taking chances with our lives, or are we a bit more secure, taking calculated risks that can’t hurt us that much but also making sure we’re taking care of our future.

As a special treat, I’m sharing a recent video I did on the subject. I mention my other blog, since that’s the YouTube channel I represent, but it fits here well because of the topic. I ask you to think about how you see money, and if it’s not in your best interest as you see it then figure out where you want to make changes. If you want to see more, check out this article about relationships with money; talk about a timely topic. :-)
 


http://youtu.be/l80hH_b7bQo

 

Digiprove sealCopyright secured by Digiprove © 2014 Mitch Mitchell
Listen with webreader

Last night I was reading about the financial woes of Samsung Electronics, the company that makes the highly rated Galaxy phone series and Note series. Sales have lagged and the company has had 3 losing quarters in a row and is expected to make it four pretty soon.

Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Creative Commons License Kārlis Dambrāns via Compfight

It seems incredible because, as much as people talk about Apple and their iPhone series, most tech magazines say the Galaxy is the better phone. Yet, it doesn’t seem to matter all that much. And if Galaxy takes a major tumble and the company starts having major difficulties (which it might, as its president had a heart attack in May and none of the creator’s 3 children are ready to assume leadership), it won’t be alone.

Barnes & Noble’s Nook tablet, aka e-reader, is also suffering lagging sales, even after drastically dropping the price on their top end model. Once again, it was rated as superior to the Amazon Kindle Fire by all the tech and computer magazines, yet Amazon’s on top. It’s not that people don’t want to read books electronically because they do; it’s that Amazon itself seems to have much more to offer than B&N, which is breaking off its technology group from the book group, leaving neither with all that firm of a grasp of survival, which will depress me to no end.

This isn’t even a new phenomenon as far as history goes. Who remembers Betamax vs. VHS? Betamax was much better as far as the picture went, and you didn’t have that hiss you often got with VHS tapes. But there was an appeal to the VHS and Betamax didn’t have a chance, one of Sony’s few losses at the time.

You also had the competition between video discs and DVDs, which DVDs won because they were easier to manage, even though video discs were better quality early on. Video discs were the size of record albums but thicker and heavier, thus hard to manage and store. Later on, Blu-Ray put HD DVD out of the marketplace even though HD DVD was better at the time by adding it to one of their gaming consoles and Sony, which learned lessons from years earlier, marketing like crazy.

Seth Schoen
@mjb via Compfight

Why doesn’t better always win? Because companies always perceive that people want better and, when all is said and done, most people really don’t want that. If they did, records would still be popular because the sound quality of a CD or digital file can’t come close to a record. But records are unwieldy when compared to digital files, which can be put on small MP3 players or even smartphones and carted around much easier.

The financial question is in trying to figure out where to put your money. As someone who used to be an early adopter of many things, I would offer the advice that it’s not always the best thing to try to be first. The only piece of technology I bought before others was what was called the Lifedrive Palm, which actually had a hard drive in it and thus greater capacity than any Palm ever created. However, it was buggy, crashed a lot, cost way too much and I had it replaced twice before I cut my losses, which wouldn’t have mattered anyway because the company was on its way out the door.

I didn’t buy the first Nook but did buy it when it came out in HD after seeing the reviews. It never occurred to me that Amazon would crush competition like it did. As a matter of fact, one of the strangest relationships is that Samsung, who I started talking about earlier, will be creating a special tablet series for B&N called the Galaxy Tab 4 Nook, deciding to try to compete with the iPad as a last gasp; good luck with that.

Wait a few months, read news stories to see how things are going, and then decide on what to purchase. These days, you could lose a lot of money by buying the wrong thing, although, if it makes you feel better, many of these items will still be good even if the companies go down because it’s more about the plan you have and access than the item itself.
 

Digiprove sealCopyright secured by Digiprove © 2014 Mitch Mitchell

I recently had some work done in my house and though I think we did pretty well overall, I also believe there were a few things we should have done differently that might have made the process not only go a little smoother, but might have saved us some money or enhanced their time. Here [...]

Just the other day I had a conversation with the agent behind the National Car rental company. I had just flown into town and, as always, was about to hand the guy my debit card… until I stopped. Marc via Compfight You see, whenever you use a debit card, rental car companies will immediately put [...]

Insurance; love it or hate it, sometimes it’s a necessity we all have to deal with. In most states some of it is mandatory, whether it’s car insurance or homeowners insurance. David Hilowitz via Compfight The best thing about insurance is that it’s there to help us out when we need it. The worst thing [...]

A couple of weeks ago I helped my wife get a reservation at a hotel. She’s giving a presentation out of town for an organization that’s staying at a top flight resort in North Carolina. Marc via Compfight The problem initially wasn’t the nightly price of the hotel. Because it’s an organizational event they were [...]